The Art of Internal Investigations

There is an art to conducting internal investigations.  Anyone who tells you otherwise is probably wedded to a  formulaic approach to internal investigations.  Cookie cutters will not always get the job done.

When a company turns to an internal investigation, the board and senior management have to be careful – there are so many risks.  The internal investigation has to focus on an end result and a vision for how to get there.  Of course, you cannot plan out every possible twist and turn but like any investigation, counsel has to know where the investigation is headed and have a reasonable plan for how to accomplish the goal.  Along the way, new tactics may be needed.

One of the most important issues is something that you never hear about.  If outside counsel is needed, does the counsel and the team have the ability to obtain information from people?  In other words, do they have the interviewing and interpersonal skills to secure information from officers and employees in the company?  A company needs to consider this question and be honest about outside counsel’s capability.

I admit my own prejudice in this area.  To me, former federal prosecutors or public defenders are the only persons that should be considered to conduct such inquiries.  Why?  They are more likely to have the skills and experience in conducting successful witness interviews.  For prosecutors and public defenders, this was their bread and butter and they know how to do this.  Of course, some were not very adept at it, but odds are they will be able to conduct effective interviews.

A company needs to assess outside counsel on this issue. Does outside counsel have the ability to conduct interviews, get along with people, and gather the necessary information? 

Document production and review are critical in this area, and technical know how in document searches is a major plus.  Most firms recognize now the importance of providing cutting-edge search technologies and capabilities at cost effective rates.  With the documents in hand, interviews can be done quickly and effectively in a targeted way.

Outside counsel who offer “casting a wide net” services are looking more to build up huge bills with very marginal benefits to their clients.  Like any investigation, outside counsel need to focus the inquiry, develop a vision, and move quickly to conduct the inquiry and report back to the company. Companies need to focus on these issues when retaining outside counsel.

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Lindsay says:

    Great article Michael! Selecting outside counsel is an important task, as a company needs to make sure they are choosing the best person (or team) for the job. Focusing on the end result and the ultimate goal of the investigation is a very important point to keep in mind during an investigation. It helps keep the investigation on track even when some curve balls are tossed your way.

  2. Jon May says:

    I share your prejudice, but I am a former federal prosecutor and public defender so I am somewhat biased as well. Depending on the case it may also be important for counsel to have the assistance of the right investigator. Some former agents and detectives are better at getting people to open up.

  3. Ben Hogan says:

    Mike, great point concerning the importance of the interview and who performs it.

    During presentations, I often discuss the importance of relationship questions during interviews. Not only are they open-ended providing lots of room for sharing, but they make the interviewer seem like they know more than they do.

    If the interviewer starts with a content question, then it immediately puts the interviewee in defense/protection mode concerning themselves or their friends.

    Using relationships an interviewer can craft an environment where the interviewee thinks that they have been under surveillance for a while and that the interviewer knows a great deal concerning the matter. No longer are they a “snitch,” but instead they can claim that “they already knew everything.” The reality is the interviewer merely asked a simple question over and over: “What is the nature of your relationship with A, B … Z?” Start with the ancillary strong relationships that are not related to the case and spiral towards the key people in the case. Once they know they have nowhere to hide, they cannot help but open up.

    Warning – here is where I mention my product — The only way to ask relationship questions is to have an understanding of the individuals relationship profile – based upon their behaviors, who do they trust most? There is only one tool that can provide those answers in 30-90 minutes, before collection of email, and before the first interview – Catelas.

    • Michael Volkov says:

      Ben — great points. You are exactly right and it will help the interview very much. I am posting another article about interviews tomorrow or the next day.

  1. November 10, 2011

    […] Fox explains a reason to split a ubiquitous warn and arch correspondence officer roles. Mike Volkov exhibits a art of general investigations. asks either a new SFO whistleblower hotline will […]

  2. November 11, 2011

    […] The Art of Internal Investigations: Michael Volkov, Corruption, Crime and Compliance, discusses some of the key issues surrounding internal investigations. […]