Featured Articles:

When the Government Wants Out and the Judge Wants Answers: DOJ Takes the Adani Dismissal Fight to the Second Circuit

The Adani prosecution has become one of the most closely watched corruption cases in the country, and not because of the facts alleged in the indictment. It is now a contest over a narrower and more consequential question: when the Justice Department decides it no longer wants to pursue a criminal case, how much of an explanation does a federal court get to demand? On...

Your Employees Are Already Using AI. Where Is Your Policy?

AI is not coming to your company. It is already there. Employees are drafting emails, summarizing contracts, writing code and analyzing data with AI tools today, many on personal accounts the company never approved. If your organization does not have a responsible AI use policy, you do not have an AI strategy. You have an AI exposure. The Risk Is Not Theoretical The warning signs...

Pick Up the Phone Before the Algorithm Does: DOJ and HHS-OIG Reroute Health Care Fraud Self-Disclosure

For years, a healthcare company that discovered possible wrongdoing faced two questions at once: should we tell the government, and which part of the government should hear it first? On October 15, 2026, the Justice Department’s National Fraud Enforcement Division and the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General answered the second question with a joint Policy on Coordination of Voluntary Self-Disclosure...

Episode 461 — $1.21 Billion: How Bank of America’s Monitoring System Failed and Why Management Is on the Hook

In this episode of Corruption, Crime and Compliance, Michael Volkov examines the more than $1.21 billion in Treasury penalties announced October 13, 2026 against Bank of America, including FinCEN’s $1.2 billion consent order, which credits the OCC’s record $750 million penalty and includes the bank’s admission that it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Volkov explains how the bank’s homegrown transaction monitoring system, Event Processor,...

Episode 460 — A $5,950 Machine and a $175,000 Sanctions Lesson

In this episode of Corruption, Crime and Compliance, Michael Volkov examines OFAC’s October 9, 2026 settlement with Pegasus Worldwide Logistics, a small California freight forwarder that agreed to pay $175,015 for apparent violations of counter narcotics sanctions and OFAC reporting obligations. Pegasus arranged the shipment of a $5,950 sugar packet-filling machine from a China-based supplier that had been designated, but had changed its name while...

Does Your Compliance Data Prove Your Program Works?

Compliance used to count training completions. Today, regulators want proof your program actually works. That shift didn’t happen by accident. Twenty years ago, compliance data meant hotline calls and a training checklist. The numbers were easy to collect and nearly impossible to interpret. A quiet hotline could mean a great culture or a terrified workforce. Then regulators started asking harder questions: Do you track your...

A $5,950 Sugar Packet Machine and a $175,015 Lesson: OFAC’s Pegasus Worldwide Logistics Settlement

On October 9, 2026, OFAC announced a $175,015 settlement with Pegasus Worldwide Logistics, a California freight forwarder of about a dozen employees. The dollar figure is modest, and the shipment at the center of the case was a machine worth $5,950. But the action is one of the clearest recent illustrations of how an ordinary trade transaction becomes a sanctions violation, and it speaks directly...

FinCEN Proposes to Rewrite the AML Program Rule Around One Question: Does Your Program Actually Work?

For decades, the legal test for an anti-money laundering program under the Bank Secrecy Act has been, in practice, a test of completeness. Did the institution have written policies? A designated compliance officer? Independent testing? Training? Examiners checked for the pillars, and an institution with all of them in place could reasonably feel it had met its obligation, even if no one could say whether...

Episode 459 — Inside DOJ Directive 26-12: The Ten Factors That Decide Whether Your Company Gets Charged

In this episode of Corruption, Crime and Compliance, Michael Volkov breaks down DOJ Directive 26-12, the October 1, 2026 memorandum in which Assistant Attorney General Colin McDonald sets corporate enforcement policy for the National Fraud Enforcement Division. He explains the Division’s four investigative priorities, health care, procurement and government contracts, revenue evasion, and tariff evasion, import and forced labor schemes, and walks through the ten...