Featured Articles:

Cartel Terrorism Designations Are Quietly Rewriting Corporate Risk in Latin America

A significant shift in U.S. enforcement policy is underway, and most companies operating in Mexico, Brazil, and elsewhere in Latin America have not yet fully absorbed what it means for them. Over the past year and a half, the government has moved major cartels and organized criminal networks onto the same legal footing as international terrorist organizations. That reclassification is not a symbolic gesture. It...

Should Compliance Programs Relax When DOJ Enforcement Slows Down?

When it comes to DOJ enforcement, the pendulum swings, and it always returns. Don’t let it knock you off your feet. I’ve been watching the headlines, and so have you. Fewer corporate guilty pleas, non-prosecution agreements for Alibaba and Eagle Bank, charges dropped against Boeing and Halkbank from Turkey. The word from Main Justice is: hold individuals accountable, go easier on companies. I get why...

An Entity List Name, a Fake Email, and a Guilty Plea: What the Shevlyakov Case Tells Export Compliance Teams

The guilty plea entered by Estonian national Andrey Shevlyakov is a useful reminder of just how far the Justice Department is willing to reach, geographically and procedurally, to prosecute export control evasion tied to the Russian military. Shevlyakov, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit export violations, has agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine and faces up to 40 years in prison for his...

Episode 438 — The Fight to Save the Corporate Transparency Act: An Urgent Update

In this update episode of Corruption, Crime and Compliance, Michael Volkov speaks with Erica Hanichak of the FACT Coalition and Frank Russo of Modern Fortis about the current fight over the Corporate Transparency Act, the 2021 law requiring companies to report their beneficial owners to a secure Treasury Department database in order to close off the U.S.’s longstanding status as an easy jurisdiction for setting...

DOJ’s Corporate Leniency Wave: Fewer Charges for Companies And Continued Focus On Individuals

A clear pattern has emerged in Justice Department corporate enforcement over the past several months, and it is worth compliance officers and general counsel taking notice: companies are being charged far less often, even in cases where prosecutors believed executives or managers were personally involved in the underlying wrongdoing, and that reduced corporate exposure has not been matched by a corresponding increase in individual prosecutions....

Episode 437 — Where Your CCO Reports Tells Me Everything: The Quiet Backslide in Compliance Reporting

Michael Volkov examines a troubling backslide in corporate governance: the quiet movement of chief compliance officers back under the general counsel after years of progress toward direct CEO reporting lines. Michael explains why the CCO’s reporting structure is the single clearest signal a company sends about the value it places on compliance — shaping whether compliance influences business strategy at the design stage or is...

Is a Quiet Compliance Hotline Really Good News?

In the compliance world, no news is not good news. Let me ask you a question every CCO should be asking right now: Are your employees actually reporting and using your hotline to report legitimate concerns? Too many compliance officers look at a quiet hotline and breathe a sigh of relief. No calls, no complaints. Must mean everything’s fine. I’m here to tell you that’s...

The Quiet Backslide: When Compliance Retreats Into the Legal Department

In my last post, I made the affirmative case for CCO empowerment — a direct reporting line to the CEO and a dotted line to the audit committee. Today I want to address the disturbing counter-trend: companies moving compliance back under the general counsel, often justified as cost discipline or organizational simplification. Make no mistake about what this movement represents. It is a retreat from...

The Scoular Company FCPA Resolution, Part 3: Lessons Learned

Parts 1 and 2 of this series covered the terms of The Scoular Company’s deferred prosecution agreement and the mechanics of the bribery scheme itself, a six-year pattern of $2,000 payments per train, dressed up as reinspection fees, paid through customs brokers to keep contaminated agricultural shipments moving across the U.S.-Mexico border. In this final installment, we draw out the practical lessons for compliance officers,...

The Scoular Company FCPA Resolution, Part 2: Inside the Scheme and the Control Failures That Enabled It

In Part 1 of this series, we outlined the terms of The Scoular Company’s deferred prosecution agreement and how DOJ applied its Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy to the case. In Part 2, we go deeper into the facts themselves, because the mechanics of this scheme, and the specific control gaps that allowed it to run for six years, are exactly the kind of...