Is Your Sanctions Screening Enough?

Are you rubbing elbows with criminals?

When OFAC designates someone a specially designated national, or SDN, it’s not a warning label. It’s a legal wall.

Every asset that party has anywhere in U.S. jurisdiction, or in the hands of a U.S. person, is frozen. Every U.S. person is barred from transacting with them, directly or indirectly.

The trap is OFAC’s 50% rule, which means any entity owned 50% or more in aggregate by blocked persons is automatically blocked too, even if it never appears on the published list.

A clean name screen doesn’t mean a clean counterparty if you haven’t traced the ownership behind it.

Enforcement is ratcheting up hard right now: Iran-related designations, cartel terrorism, Russia sanctions and evasion networks. The stakes are real – civil penalties in the tens of millions, frozen wires, correspondent banking risk, and secondary sanctions that can cut even non-U.S. companies off from the dollar system entirely.

Sanctions screening can’t be a one-time check-the-box exercise.

You need ongoing, ownership-aware screening that re-screens existing counterparties as the list evolves and actually traces beneficial ownership, not just the name on the contract.

The Ethics and Compliance Q and A show is produced by One Stone Creative.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *